The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.nahar Textiles Pvt.ltd
High Court
17 Nov 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.nahar Textiles Pvt.ltd
Date of order
17 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S.nahar Textiles Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3650/2008 IN ITXA (L) NO.2297/2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Nahar Textiles Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Ms.Asifa Khan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 17th November, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 592 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice
of Motion, and also perused the Affidavit in reply. The
Appeal is against the ITAT’s order dated 13.12.2006. It
appears that though the Chief CIT had granted approval
for filing Appeal on 27.4.2007 the Appeal came to be
filed belatedly on 29.7.2008. We are not satisfied with
the reasons given for condonation of delay. The reasons
given for delay that of getting the draft memo of Appeal
prepared and the other reasons beyond the control of the
Appellant’s office including administrative exigencies
and the procedural formalities etc., does not appear to
be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for
condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands
dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2297/2008 also stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.