The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8Mumbai v. M/S. Britacel Silicones Ltd
High Court
30 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8Mumbai v. M/S. Britacel Silicones Ltd
Date of order
30 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8Mumbai v. M/S. Britacel Silicones Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1101 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 20078
The Commissioner of Income tax-8Mumbai
... Appellant
Vs
M/s. Britacel Silicones Ltd... Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar i/by Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr. Pramod Kumar Parida for the respondent.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.,&
A.P DESHPANDE
, J.
DATE : 30TH
JULY, 2008
P.C.:
We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the
parties. The order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 3[rd]May, 2007 is challenged in the present appeal. We see, there ishardly any question of law that would arise in the present case. TheTribunal had referred the matter to the Assessing Officer in regard torecomputing the deduction under section 80 HHC of the Act afterreducing the deduction under section 80IB from the total income in
accordance with the judgments of the Special Bench passed in ITA963/Mad/2005 and ITA No.1518/Mad/2006 and with regard to thedifference on account of foreign exchange fluctuation as part ofturnover and directed to allow the deduction under section 80HHC asper the provisions of law.
2.
We see no reason to interfere. Dismissed. However, we
leave the question open to be considered by the appropriate authority.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.