Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8Mumbai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8Mumbai v. M/S. Evergreen Engineering Co. Ltd

High Court 04 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8Mumbai v. M/S. Evergreen Engineering Co. Ltd
Date of order
04 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8Mumbai v. M/S. Evergreen Engineering Co. Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: P.C.: 1.The following question of law has been framed in the appeal filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5th June, 2008 : "(a) Whether the unutilized Modvat credit is to be included in the valuation of the closing stock under section 145 A of the Incom...

Decision: In view of the aforesaid statement, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2296 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-8Mumbai Vs. M/s. Evergreen Engineering Co. Ltd. .... Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. .... ..Appellant. ..Respondent. CORAM:DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. 4th January, 2010. P.C.: 1.The following question of law has been framed in the appeal filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5th June, 2008 : "(a) Whether the unutilized Modvat credit is to be included in the valuation of the closing stock under section 145 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"" The Tribunal has followed the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Mahavir Aluminium Limited (297 ITR 77). Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue has stated that the judgment of the Delhi High Court has been followed by a Division Bench of this Court in the order dated 1st April, 2009 in the Commissioner of Income Tax v. The Mahalaxmi Glass Works Pvt. Ltd.(Income Tax Appeal 192 of 2009). Consequently, it was submitted that the issue is covered by the aforesaid judgments of the Delhi High Court and this Court against the Revenue. In view of the aforesaid statement, the appeal is dismissed. (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan