The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. M.s. Paramount Apparels Pvt. Ltd
High Court
08 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. M.s. Paramount Apparels Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. M.s. Paramount Apparels Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: By the impugned order dated 31st January, 2012, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
SRK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.778 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income tax -9, Mumbai
V/SM.s. Paramount Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the revenue.
Mr. P.C. Tripathi i/by Mr. A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.AND A.K. MENON, J.
P.C.
DATED : 8[th] October, 2014
This appeal challenges the order passed by the Tribunal in Income tax Appeal No.2539/Mum/2011 for the assessment year 2004-05. By the impugned order dated 31st January, 2012, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty. In deleting the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), Mumbai and the Tribunal held that merely because the assessee’s claim is rejected by the Assessing Officer does not mean that a penalty has to be levied.
2.In such circumstances, the Tribunal’s order does not raise any substantial question of law. The Tribunal has found that the assessee has not concealed the income or filed inaccurate particulars pertaining thereto.
3.For all these reasons, the appeal fails. It is accordingly dismissed.
(A.K. Menon, J.)
(S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.