The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. M/S.ajanta Pharma Limited
High Court
13 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. M/S.ajanta Pharma Limited
Date of order
13 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. M/S.ajanta Pharma Limited, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3227 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Ajanta Pharma Limited
..Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Mr.J.D. Mistry, Senior Advocae with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 13 August 2010.
P.C. :
1.On the request of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and Counsel for the assessee, the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 26 December 2008 in so far as it pertains to the assessment year 2003-04 is set aside, in respect of Ground No.4 raised by the Revenue. The Appeal shall stand restored to the file of the Tribunal for a fresh disposal in accordance with law.
2.The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as
to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue