The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. M/S.allied Instruments Private Limited
High Court
16 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. M/S.allied Instruments Private Limited
Date of order
16 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
2001-02, 2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. M/S.allied Instruments Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: P.C. : DATE : 16th September 2011 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.988 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Allied Instruments Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vima Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 16th September 2011
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The assessment year involved herein is AY 2001-02.
3.In the present case, the assessing officer has re-opened the assessment for assessment year 2001-02 and in the reassessment order partial claim of the assessee made under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was disallowed by following his decision in the case of assessee for assessment year 2002-03. The assessing officer thereupon levied penalty
under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that the assessee had made wrong allocation of expenses.
4.. Admittedly, the disallowance made by the assessing officer for assessment year 2002-03 has been set aside by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the matter is restored to the file of the assessing officer for fresh examination.
4.In this view of the matter, in our opinion this is not a fit case for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. Tated, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.