Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S.dharmik Exim Private Limited

High Court 20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S.dharmik Exim Private Limited
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S.dharmik Exim Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 1.Although three questions of law are raised by the Revenue in this appeal, the basic question is whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the reopening of the assessment was not valid.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.123 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Dharmik Exim Private Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Pankaj R. Toprani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 20[th] July, 2011. 1.Although three questions of law are raised by the Revenue in this appeal, the basic question is whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the reopening of the assessment was not valid. 2.Admittedly, the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the present case has been issued beyond four years from the end of relevant assessment year 2000-01. The finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal is that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. 3.Since the decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact, no substantial question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan