The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S.telebuild Constructions Private Limited
High Court
20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S.telebuild Constructions Private Limited
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S.telebuild Constructions Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the basic question raised in this Appeal.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5553 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Telebuild Constructions Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 20[th] July, 2011.
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the basic question raised in this Appeal.
2.In the present case, the assessee in the Return of Income relating to assessment year 2004-05 claimed deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee gave up its claim seeking deduction under Section 80IB(10). The Assessing Officer while disallowing claim under Section 80IB(10), imposed penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal has deleted the
penalty on the ground that the assessee bona fide believed that it was entitled to deduction under Section 80IB(10) and when it was pointed out that the assessee was not entitled to claim deduction, the assessee gave up its claim for deduction under Section 80IB(10). The Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that the assessee had disclosed all material facts necessary for the assessment and only dispute was regarding interpretation of relevant provisions of law regarding allowability of deduction under Section 80IB(10). The Tribunal has held that in view of the bona fide action on the part of the assessee, it is not a fit case for levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3.In our opinion, the discretion exercised by the Tribunal does not call for any interference. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.