The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9 , Mumbai v. Rusan Pharma Limited
High Court
29 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9 , Mumbai v. Rusan Pharma Limited
Date of order
29 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004, 2001-2002
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9 , Mumbai v. Rusan Pharma Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1066 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 9 , Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Rusan Pharma Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 29TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. This appeal is directed against the order of the tribunal for assessment year 2003-2004. Relying upon the order of the tribunal for A.Y. 2001-2002, the appeal was dismissed by the tribunal. Appeal preferred against the order for A.Y 2001-2002 being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2751 of 2007 has already been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 15-4-2008.
2.If the findings recorded in the order for A.Y. 2001-2002, on which reliance has been placed by the tribunal, has become final, we do not see any substantial question of law involved in this appeal. The appeal is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue