Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. Technimont Icb Private Limited, Mumbai

High Court 30 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. Technimont Icb Private Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
30 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai v. Technimont Icb Private Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1691 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Technimont ICB Private Limited, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.Tejveer Singh for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani with Mr.P.C. Tripathi for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 30[th] January 2013 P.C. : 1.The basic issue arising in this appeal is, whether the assessing officer is entitled to reopen the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 beyond the period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year ? 2.The Tribunal in the impugned order has recorded a finding of fact that the respondent – assessee had furnished all details at the time of filing its return and completion of assessment originally under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, re-opening is being done merely on change of opinion. Moreover, the Tribunal recorded a fact that the reasons recorded by the assessing officer do not mention that there was any failure on the part of the respondent – assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment. 3.In view of the fact that the decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact, the present appeal cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan