The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Extrusion Processes Ltd
High Court
11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Extrusion Processes Ltd
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Extrusion Processes Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Though we have condoned the delay, the appellant isdirected to remove the office objections, if any, withinfour weeks from today failing which appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further referenceto the court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4446 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2614 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income tax-9.
..Appellant.
Vs.
Extrusion Processes Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr.S.M.Shah with Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.S.G. Lakhani for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 11TH FEBRUARY,2008.
PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condonation of 149days delay in preferring the main appeal. We haveperused the affidavit in support. Taking into accountthe facts stated in the affidavit in support, we proposeto accept the cause shown for condonation of delay.Notice of motion is therefore, allowed and the delay infiling the appeal stands condoned. Office to number theappeal and list the same for admission.2. Though we have condoned the delay, the appellant isdirected to remove the office objections, if any, withinfour weeks from today failing which appeal to stand
dismissed for non prosecution without further referenceto the court.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue