The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Hathway Investments Pvt. Ltd
High Court
31 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Hathway Investments Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
31 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Hathway Investments Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 405 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9versus
..Appellant
Hathway Investments Pvt. Ltd...Respondent
--------
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr. B.D.Damodar for the Respondent.
.............
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 31[st] January, 2013
P.C.:
In this appeal by the revenue, the basic
question which arises for our consideration is:
“Whetheronthefactsand circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that set off against long term capital loss is allowable in respect of a depreciable capital assets which is deemed short term gain in terms of section 50 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”
2The Tribunal has allowed the claim of the assessee by following the decision of this court in the matter of ACE Builders Pvt. Ltd. reported in 281 ITR 210. Further, the revenue has not been able to show any distinguishing features in this
SNC
case from that of ACE Builders (Supra). In the above circumstances, we find no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
3Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.