Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S Arun Mantex Ltd

High Court 14 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S Arun Mantex Ltd
Date of order
14 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S Arun Mantex Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and is dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1364 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-9.. AppellantVs.M/s Arun Mantex Ltd...Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantNone for Respondent P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave towithdraw the appeal. Appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and is dismissed as such. PermissbleCourt fees be refunded to the appellant as perrules. { A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan