In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S. Multi Flex Lami Prints Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1811 OF 2012IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.741 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9versus
M/s. Multi Flex Lami Prints Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
--------
Ms. Pooja Tarachand i/b Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Ms. Aparna Hirandagi for the Respondent.
.............
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 28[th ]August, 2012
P.C. :
The delay of 301 days was apparently on account of the administrative difficulties faced by the appellant. The panel of the Advocates was
changed, resulting in a delay in transferring the papers and issuing the fresh instruction.
The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a).
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue