In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S.apollo Finvest India Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the petition is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.566 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9...Appellant
vs.
M/s.Apollo Finvest India Ltd....Respondent.
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar, for Appellant.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:15[th] September,2008.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned Counsel appearing forappellant. The findings of the tribunal are basedessentially on the findings of facts. No question oflaw arises. Hence, the petition is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
2
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.