In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9 v. M/S.jyoti Plastic Works Private Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, all the appeals are disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5040 OF 2010ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5044 OF 2010ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5047 OF 2010ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5049 OF 2010AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5115 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 9
Versus
......Appellant
M/s.Jyoti Plastic Works Private Limited
......Respondent.
Mr.N.A. Kazi for the appellant.Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani with Ms. Keyuri Desai and Ms. Anamika Malhotra for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE :
15[th] November 2011
P.C.:
1.Similar questions raised by the Revenue in the assessee’s own case for AY 1999-2000, being Income Tax Appeal No.5045 of 2010 have been answered by this Court in favour of the assessee and against the assessee decided today i.e. 15[th] November 2011. For the reasons stated therein, all the appeals are disposed of with no order as to costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue