In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Vinroyal Plasticoates Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3094 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2011 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9.
Vs.
Vinroyal Plasticoates Ltd.
.....
Mr.J.S. Saluja for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
...Appellant
...Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
11 June 2010.
P.C. :
The Motion is for restoration of an appeal which has been dismissed for non-compliance of the conditional order. Sufficient cause has been shown and the Court is informed that the office objections have been removed. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant states that the Respondent has been served and undertakes to file an affidavit of service within one week. The Motion is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
The appeal to be placed for admission on 18 June 2010.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue