The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mumbai v. M/S. General Abrasive Co.pvt.ltd. )........ Respondant
High Court
02 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mumbai v. M/S. General Abrasive Co.pvt.ltd. )........ Respondant
Date of order
02 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mumbai v. M/S. General Abrasive Co.pvt.ltd. )........ Respondant, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3823 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1295 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax-9,Mumbai).......Appellantversus
M/s. General Abrasive Co.Pvt.Ltd.)........ Respondant.
Mr.J.S. Saluja i/b P.P. Kakade for the Appellant.Mr. Pratapsingh Rananavare for the respondent.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., &
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED: 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:
1.This is an application for condonation of delay of sevendays in filing of the appeal. The counsel for the respondent hasno objection. Hence delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is madeabsolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion isaccoridngly disposed of. List the appeal for admission on 23[rd]September 2008.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue