Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ahmedaba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ahmedabad - Ii v. Labh Construction & Industriesltd. ==========================================================

High Court 20 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ahmedabad - Ii v. Labh Construction & Industriesltd. ==========================================================
Date of order
20 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ahmedabad - Ii v. Labh Construction & Industriesltd. ==========================================================, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed in light of the Circular dated 06.09.2019.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1198 of 2007With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1199 of 2007 ========================================================== THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD - II VersusLABH CONSTRUCTION & INDUSTRIESLTD. ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MR BS SOPARKAR FOR MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 20/09/2019 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1.Heard Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant and Mr. B.S. Soparkar, learned advocate for the respondent. 2.Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant, has stated that the tax effect involved in these appeals is less than Rs.1,00,00,000/-. Under the circumstances, in the light of the Circular No.23 of 2019 dated 06.09.2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which provides that no appeal wherein the tax effect does not C/TAXAP/1198/2007 ORDER exceed the monetary limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/- shall be filed before the High Court and which has also been made retrospectively applicable to pending appeals, the learned senior standing counsel for the appellant does not press the present appeals. 3.The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed in light of the Circular dated 06.09.2019. However, in case there is any error in the computation of the tax effect involved or if, for any reason, the Circular is not applicable, it would be open for the appellant to seek revival of the appeal/s. (HARSHA DEVANI, J) PRAVIN KARUNAN (SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan