The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S. Shrenik Marbles P Ltd., Makrana Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh
High Court
04 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S. Shrenik Marbles P Ltd., Makrana Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh
Date of order
04 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. M/S. Shrenik Marbles P Ltd., Makrana Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.50/2017In
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.268/2009
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer
----Petitioner
Versus
M/s. Shrenik Marbles P Ltd., Makrana Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Parinitoo Jain withMs. Shiva Goyal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Order
04/01/2019
This application has been filed by the applicant for recall of thejudgment dated 13.05.2016 and for restoration of the appeal to itsoriginal number on the ground that the tax effect in the appeal wasmore than Rs.20,00,000/-.
The appeal was decided in the light of the earlier CBDT Circulardated 10.12.2015 on the premise that the tax effect in this appealwas less than Rs.20,00,000/- but actually the tax effect was morethan Rs.20,00,000/-. Learned counsel for the applicant, however, didnot dispute the fact that in view of new Circular dated 11.07.2018issued in supersession of earlier Circular dated 10.12.2015, the limithas been raised to Rs.50,00,000/- and, therefore, the tax effect,being less than Rs.50,00,000/-, no useful purpose would be servedby reviving the appeal.
The application is accordingly disposed of.
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.