Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. Shri Chain Sukh Rathi

High Court 03 May 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. Shri Chain Sukh Rathi
Date of order
03 May 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. Shri Chain Sukh Rathi, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER D.B. MISC. RESTORATION APPLICATION NO. 283/2012 IND.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 798/2008 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMERVS. SHRI CHAIN SUKH RATHI. DATE OF ORDER : 03.05.2012 '-HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAINIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for the appellant. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and after considering hersubmissions and for the reasons mentioned inthe applications, duly supported byaffidavits, delay of 38 days in filingrestoration application is condoned andincome tax appeal is restored to its originalnumber. Both the applications stand allowed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I),J. Manoj. “All corrections made in the judgment/order have beenincorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” MANOJ NARWANIJUNIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan