Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Gillette India Ltd., 65-A, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi

High Court 28 Nov 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Gillette India Ltd., 65-A, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi
Date of order
28 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Gillette India Ltd., 65-A, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: (2) Whether the Minimum Alternate Tax is at par withAdvance-tax on TDS/TCS or regular tax as envisagedin the Act?” Learned counsel for the parties do not dispute that both thequestions, on which this appeal was admitted, stand alreadyanswered by a coordinate bench of this court vide judgment dated 1...

Decision: In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.864/2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Alwar ----Appellant Versus M/s. Gillette India Ltd., 65-A, Industrial Area, Bhiwadi ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mrs. Parinitoo JainFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR Order 28/11/2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused thematerial on record. This court, vide order dated 08.11.2010, admitted thepresent appeal on the following two substantial questions of law:- “(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case and in law, the Tribunal was justified inholding that first stage of tax payable is advance-taxand assessee is entitled to set off the MAT credit atthis stage whereas total income is computable onlyafter closing of the financial year, not at the state ofpayment of advance tax therefore set off of credit forMAT to be allowed after allowing credit of advance-taxu/S 219 of IT Act, 1961? (2) Whether the Minimum Alternate Tax is at par withAdvance-tax on TDS/TCS or regular tax as envisagedin the Act?” Learned counsel for the parties do not dispute that both thequestions, on which this appeal was admitted, stand alreadyanswered by a coordinate bench of this court vide judgment dated 16.05.2017 while dismissing a bunch of appeals leading one being D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.626/2008 – C.I.T. Alwar Vs. M/s. Gillate India Limited. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed. (GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J //Jaiman//43
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan