Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur

High Court 17 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur
Date of order
17 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 302/2017 In D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.808/2008 The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus M/s. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Parnitoo JainFor Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 17/10/2019 Learned counsel for the applicant submits that thisapplication was filed by the Revenue for revival of the income taxappeal No.808/2008 as at the relevant time limit, for filing appealwas Rs.20 lacs but pursuant to recent circular issued by CentralBoard of Direct Taxes dated 08.08.2019 the said limit has beenraised up to 1 crore and therefore, there would be no purpose ingetting the appeal revived. Learned counsel for the applicant,therefore, does not press this application. The application is dismissed as not pressed. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J Manish/Manoj/s-86
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan