The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur
High Court
17 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur
Date of order
17 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 302/2017
In
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.808/2008
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar.
----Petitioner
Versus
M/s. Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Parnitoo JainFor Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
17/10/2019
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that thisapplication was filed by the Revenue for revival of the income taxappeal No.808/2008 as at the relevant time limit, for filing appealwas Rs.20 lacs but pursuant to recent circular issued by CentralBoard of Direct Taxes dated 08.08.2019 the said limit has beenraised up to 1 crore and therefore, there would be no purpose ingetting the appeal revived. Learned counsel for the applicant,therefore, does not press this application.
The application is dismissed as not pressed.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J
Manish/Manoj/s-86
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.