The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Bhatt Production
High Court
20 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Bhatt Production
Date of order
20 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Bhatt Production, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 273 OF 2006
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 273 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App
Versus
M/s. Bhatt Production ... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Dr. K. Shivram with Mr. Ajay R. Singh for the
Respondent.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 20, 2009P.C.
DATED: JANUARY 20, 2009
P.C.
. C.I.T. (A) in the appeal preferred by the
assessee held that the amount had to be assessed for
the assessment Year 1997-98 in the hands of the
assessee on substantive basis. An appeal came to be
preferred by the Revenue before ITAT. ITAT upheld
the order of the C.I.T. (A).
. The Revenue in respect of the order of ITAT
preferred an appeal in this court but on some other
questions but not on this issue. The appeal was
dismissed. Once that be the case, and Revenue has
accepted the order of ITAT, consequently the present
appeal as filed would not be maintainable. Hence,
appeal dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.