Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Deepak Fertilizers & Petro

High Court 11 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Deepak Fertilizers & Petro
Date of order
11 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Deepak Fertilizers & Petro, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The Revenue has preferred this appeal on the following question of law: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the order of the Ld.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App Versus M/s. Deepak Fertilizers & Petro- Chemicals Corporation Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. B.V. Jhaveri with Ms. Priti Shukla for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2009 P.C. P.C. . The Revenue has preferred this appeal on the following question of law: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in directing to treat forfeited debenture application money of Rs.6.36 lac. as capital receipt not chargeable to tax, ignoring the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd.?" . The said question has been covered by the judgment of this court in Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 261 ITR 501. In the light of the above, question as framed would not arise and we find no reason to differ with the Coordinate Bench decision of this court. Appeal accordingly dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan