Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Fdc Limited

High Court 15 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Fdc Limited
Date of order
15 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Fdc Limited, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Issue: The appeal is admitted on the following question : "Whether the excide duty can be included in the total turn over for calculating the relief under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act?" .

Decision: Accordingly the order of the tribunal is set aside and the order of CIT dated 18.6.1999 for the Assessment Year 1996-97 is restored to that extent.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2006 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 126 OF The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App Versus M/s. FDC Limited ... Respondent Mr.Sureshkumar for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009 P.C. P.C. . The respondent though served have failed to put in appearance. . The appeal is admitted on the following question : "Whether the excide duty can be included in the total turn over for calculating the relief under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act?" . The issue has now been answered in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in 292 ITR 691. In the light of that judgment the excise duty can not be included in the total turn over for calculating the relief under Section 80 HHC. Accordingly the order of the tribunal is set aside and the order of CIT dated 18.6.1999 for the Assessment Year 1996-97 is restored to that extent. Appeal disposed of accordingly. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan