The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Fdc Limited
High Court
15 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Fdc Limited
Date of order
15 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Fdc Limited, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Issue: The appeal is admitted on the following question : "Whether the excide duty can be included in the total turn over for calculating the relief under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act?" .
Decision: Accordingly the order of the tribunal is set aside and the order of CIT dated 18.6.1999 for the Assessment Year 1996-97 is restored to that extent.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2006
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 126 OF
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App
Versus
M/s. FDC Limited ... Respondent
Mr.Sureshkumar for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2009
P.C.
P.C.
. The respondent though served have failed to put
in appearance.
. The appeal is admitted on the following question
:
"Whether the excide duty can be included in
the total turn over for calculating the
relief under Section 80 HHC of the Income
Tax Act?"
. The issue has now been answered in view of the
judgment of the Supreme Court in 292 ITR 691. In
the light of that judgment the excise duty can not
be included in the total turn over for calculating
the relief under Section 80 HHC. Accordingly the
order of the tribunal is set aside and the order of
CIT dated 18.6.1999 for the Assessment Year 1996-97
is restored to that extent. Appeal disposed of
accordingly.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.