Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Vidyut Metallics Pvt. Ltd

High Court 27 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

27 Jan 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S. Vidyut Metallics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 16 OF 2009 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 16 OF NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 16 OFIN IN INCOME TAX (L) NO. 2398 OF 2008 INCOME TAX (L) NO. 2398 OF 2008 INCOME TAX (L) NO. 2398 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App Versus M/s. Vidyut Metallics Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Applicant. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 27, 2009 DATED: JANUARY 27, 2009 DATED: JANUARY 27, 2009 P.C. P.C. . Heard the parties. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. In the event, the Respondents are not served, liberty to the respondents to apply for recalling of the order. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.