Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S.jet Airways (I) Ltd

High Court 11 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S.jet Airways (I) Ltd
Date of order
11 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. M/S.jet Airways (I) Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX (L) NO. 3213 OF 2008 INCOME TAX (L) NO. 3213 OF 2008 INCOME TAX (L) NO. 3213 OF 2008 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3864 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App Versus M/s.Jet Airways (I) Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . We are informed that in respect of the very asessee, three other appeals for the same period of delay have been dismissed by the learned bench of this court. Considering that, and even otherwise, in our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause as there is no explanation for the delay between 11.10.2006 and 22.8.2008. Considering that, motion dismissed. Consequently appeal also dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan