The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. Union Bank Of India
High Court
11 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. Union Bank Of India
Date of order
11 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... App v. Union Bank Of India, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to do so, the appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further order from this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3319 OF 2007ININCOME TAX (L) NO. 1939 OF 2007
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3319 OF
IN
INCOME TAX (L) NO. 1939 OF
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... App
Versus
Union Bank of India ... Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2009
DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2009
DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2009
P.C.
P.C.
. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned.
Office to register to appeal subject to appellant’s
removing the office objections if any within six
weeks from today. On failure to do so, the appeal
to stand dismissed for non prosecution without
further order from this court.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.