Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appella...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appellantbombay City I, Bombay v. M/S. F.f. Fotofast (P) Ltd

High Court 04 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appellantbombay City I, Bombay v. M/S. F.f. Fotofast (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.281 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income Tax : AppellantBombay City I, Bombay v/s M/s. F.F. Fotofast (P) Ltd. : Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan Advocate for AppellantsNone for respondent Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ. Date : 4.8.2008 P.C..Heard learned counsel for the appellant Mr.Sahadevan. He seeks leave to withdraw the above reference. In view therof the reference is returned back unanswered. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.