Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appella...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appellantcity -21, Mumbai 51 v. M/S. Bvp Steel Corporation

High Court 18 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appellantcity -21, Mumbai 51 v. M/S. Bvp Steel Corporation
Date of order
18 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appellantcity -21, Mumbai 51 v. M/S. Bvp Steel Corporation, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is devoid of merits and same stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1114 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax : AppellantCity -21, Mumbai 51 v/s M/s. BVP Steel Corporation : Respondent Mr. N.A. Kazi for AppellantMr. B.V. Jhaveri for respondent Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 18.9.2008 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. .In the above appeal the appellant is seeking to raise the following two questions of law. their creditworthiness? the record there is confirmation letters including PAN no. and their assessment orders. .In the light of the above there is absolutely on a finding of fact. Appeal is devoid of merits and same stands dismissed. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.)(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan