In The Commissioner Of Income Tax : Appellantmumbai City Ii v. M/S. Radhka Leasing Pvt. Works Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is allowed tobe withdrawn and dismised as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.136 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax : AppellantMumbai City II
v/s
M/s. Radhka Leasing Pvt. Works Ltd.: Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta Advocate for AppellantMr. Y.T. Jhon Advocate for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date : 4.8.2008
P.C..Heard learned counsel for the appellant andlearned counsel for the respondent. Mr. Gupta seeksleave to withdraw above appeal. Appeal is allowed tobe withdrawn and dismised as such. Rule isdischarged. Permissible court fees be refunded to the
appellant as per rules.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue