Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangab...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Jai Ambika Ssk Ltd. Mohannagar

High Court 07 Feb 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Jai Ambika Ssk Ltd. Mohannagar
Date of order
07 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Jai Ambika Ssk Ltd. Mohannagar, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, for the reasons recorded in the order passed today in Tax Appeal No.18 of 2008, this appeal is also dismissed. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] [D.G.KARNIK, J.]Dt.07/02/2012ans/TA23-08

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CORAM:D. G. KARNIK & S. B. DESHMUKH,JJ. TAX APPEAL NO.: 23 OF 2O08 The Commissioner of Income Tax, AurangabadVersus Jai Ambika SSK Ltd. Mohannagar.*** Mr. Alok Sharma, A.S.G. for the Appellant.Mr. Abhijit Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. D.J. Choudhari, Advocate for the Respondent *** 1.Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the Appellant states that the issue in this appeal is similar to the issue involved in Tax Appeal No.18 of 2008. Hence, for the reasons recorded in the order passed today in Tax Appeal No.18 of 2008, this appeal is also dismissed. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] [D.G.KARNIK, J.]Dt.07/02/2012ans/TA23-08
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan