Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangab...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Shantilal Govardhan Peety

High Court 12 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

12 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Shantilal Govardhan Peety, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 901-ITA39-2013.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Aurangabad .. Appellant Versus Shantilal Govardhan Peety .. Respondent Mr. Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for Appellant. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ. DATED : 12[th] DECEMBER, 2019. PER COURT:- .Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant on instructionsseeks leave to withdraw the appeal. 2.Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. The Court Fee as per rules be refunded. No costs. ( AVINASH G. GHAROTE ) JUDGE ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE P.S.B.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.