Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bathinda...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bathinda v. Market Committee, Sardulgarh, Distt.mansa

High Court 08 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bathinda v. Market Committee, Sardulgarh, Distt.mansa
Date of order
08 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bathinda v. Market Committee, Sardulgarh, Distt.mansa, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of above, the instant appeal is dismissed in terms of theorder passed by this Court in ITA No.654 of 2005.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA No.807of 2008 Date of Decision:8.1.2009 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bathinda Versus ---Appellant Market Committee, Sardulgarh, Distt.Mansa ---Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present:-Ms.Savita Saxena, Advocate for the appellant. ---- J.S.KHEHAR, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant very fairly states that thecontroversy involved in the instant appeal has been adjudicated upon by thisCourt in Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Amritsar, Versus MarketCommittee, Dhariwal (ITA No.654 of 2005 decided on 14.3.2007). In view of above, the instant appeal is dismissed in terms of theorder passed by this Court in ITA No.654 of 2005. (J.S.Khehar) Judge (Nawab Singh) 8.1.2009 JudgeAS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan