The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City-20 v. Sayyad Naseem Aalam, Bombay
High Court
15 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City-20 v. Sayyad Naseem Aalam, Bombay
Date of order
15 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City-20 v. Sayyad Naseem Aalam, Bombay, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 825 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Bombay city-20.vs.
Sayyad Naseem Aalam, Bombay.
AppellantRespondent
Mr.R. Asokan i/b. Mr. K. B. Rao for the appellant.
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 15th September 2004
Heard.
2. The issue raised in this appeal stands answered bythe Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case ofCadell Weaving Mill Co.Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, 249 ITR 265. However, the learned counselfor the revenue submits that the said judgment is underchallenge before the Supreme Court. Even if that be so,
in so far as we are concerned, the issue stands
concluded by the Division Bench judgment of this court.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. Appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue