The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City-Iii, Bombay v. M/S. Makers Development Services P. Ltd
High Court
22 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City-Iii, Bombay v. M/S. Makers Development Services P. Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City-Iii, Bombay v. M/S. Makers Development Services P. Ltd, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.The Reference stands disposed of in above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
suresh
247-ITR-457.1997.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.457 OF 1997
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Bombay City-III, BombayVs.M/s. Makers Development Services P. Ltd.
.... Applicant.... Respondent
None for the parties.
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 22, 2016
P.C:
1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relates to the Assessment Years 1987-88, 1988-89 and 1989-90.
2.None appears for the parties. It appears that the applicant/Revenue is not interested in pursuing the present Reference. 3.In the above view, the question as posed for our opinion is being returned unanswered. However, it is made clear that the question, as raised, is left open for consideration in an appropriate case. This Reference is thus returned unanswered. 4.The Reference stands disposed of in above terms.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Page 1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue