The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City-Iii v. Uhde Gmbh
High Court
22 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City-Iii v. Uhde Gmbh
Date of order
22 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City-Iii v. Uhde Gmbh, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
suresh
278-ITR-713.1998.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.713 OF 1998
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Bombay City-IIIVs.UHDE Gmbh C/o Uhde India Ltd.
.... Applicant.... Respondent
None for the Applicant.Mr. Atul Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 22, 2016
P.C:
Mr. Jasani, learned counsel appearing for the respondent invites our attention to the order dated 23-6-2009, passed by this Court in this very Reference, disposing of the questions posed for our opinion in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Therefore, this Reference appears wrongly on board. Same has already been disposed of by the order dated 23-6-2009.
Ordered accordingly.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Page 1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue