Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Business...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Business Circle-Viii, Chennai-34 v. M/S.essar Ve Enterprises, Chennai-1

High Court 10 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Business Circle-Viii, Chennai-34 v. M/S.essar Ve Enterprises, Chennai-1
Date of order
10 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Business Circle-Viii, Chennai-34 v. M/S.essar Ve Enterprises, Chennai-1, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN The Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle-VIII, Chennai-34. ..Appellant/ Respondent Vs M/s.Essar Ve Enterprises, Chennai-1....Respondent/Appellant APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 17.7.2015 in ITA No.528/Mds/2015 onthe file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'A'Bench for the assessment year 2010-11 against the orderdt.27.11.2014 on the file of the commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-13, Chennai in ITA NO.1743/2013-14 for theAssessment year 2010-2011 against the order dt.28.03.2013on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax,Business circle VIII, Chennai. In PAN/GAR NO. For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan and Mrs.V.PushpaFor Respondent : No appearance Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial questions of law framedare left open. In the event the tax effect is above thethreshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS vi) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarToThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench.Chennai. 2. The commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13,121,Mahathma Gandhi Road, Chennai-34.3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Business circleVIII, Chennai 6.4.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Business circle VIII,Chennai.5.The Assistant Registrar,Income Tax Appellate tribunal,III rd Floor,Besant Nagar,Rajaj Bhavan,Chennai. Copy toThe section officer,VR Section,High courtMadras +1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan , Advocate SR.No. 69888TCA.No.352 of 2016ASK(28/11/2018)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan