The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Business Circle Xii, Chennai v. M.karthikeyan
High Court
12 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Business Circle Xii, Chennai v. M.karthikeyan
Date of order
12 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Business Circle Xii, Chennai v. M.karthikeyan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question/questions of law framedis/are left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.10.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMAND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
TAX CASE APPEAL NOS.116 & 117 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle XII, Chennai
...Appellant
Vs
M.Karthikeyan...Respondent
APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the common order dated 22.5.2009 in ITA Nos.1746 and1747/Mds/2008 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate TribunalMadras 'C' Bench respectively for the assessment years 1997-98and 1999-2000.
For Appellant :
Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC
For Respondent :
Mr.A.S.Sriraman
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. These appeals by the Revenue challenge the common orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided theissue in favour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeals on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question/questions of law framedis/are left open. In the event, in each of the cases, the taxeffect is above the threshold limit fixed in the said circular,liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Court to restore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits.No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarRSTo1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras 'C' Bench.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Business Circle-XII,Chennai+1cc to Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC, Advocate, S.R.No.70835+1cc to Mr.A.S.Sriraman, Advocate, S.R.No.71010TCA.Nos.116 & 117 of 2011NRI(CO)CS/04/12/2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.