The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.oakassa Private Limited
High Court
01 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.oakassa Private Limited
Date of order
01 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.oakassa Private Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3698 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6004 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 1, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Oakassa Private Limited..Respondent.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra with Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Sanjay Udeshi for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 1[st] July, 2011.
1.The learned Counsel for the assessee opposed the Notice of
Motion on the ground that no sufficient ground is made out for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.
2.On perusal of the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, in
our opinion case is made out for condoning the delay. The Notice of Motion
is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue