Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.wockhardt Life Sciences Limited, Mumbai

High Court 07 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.wockhardt Life Sciences Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
07 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.wockhardt Life Sciences Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2446 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 1, MumbaiVersus ..Appellant. M/s.Wockhardt Life Sciences Limited, Mumbai .. .. ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant. Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 7[th] January, 2010. P.C. : 1.The dispute in the present case relates to the reopening of assessment beyond a period of four years. The Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that the assessee had disclosed all primary facts relating to the industrial undertakings relevant to the eligibility for deduction and all primary facts relating to the industrial undertakings not eligible for deduction. In view of the finding of fact, the condition precedent for invoking the provisions of Section 147 namely failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, for that assessment year, is not fulfilled. 2.The Appeal filed by the revenue does not give rise to any substantial question of law and shall accordingly stand dismissed. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan