In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1 v. M/S. Wockhardt Life Sciences Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: SSM 2.In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SSM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2296 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1.... AppellantVERSUS
M/s. Wockhardt Life Sciences Ltd.
.... Respondent
Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.Mr. A. K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR and MRIDULA BHATKAR J.J.DATED:JANUARY 25, 2011.
P.C.:
The Counsel for the revenue states that the questions
raised in this Appeal are covered against the revenue by the decision
of this Court in case of Associated Capsules Private Limited V/s.
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Cir. 43 decided on 10th
January 2011.
SSM
2.In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J)
(J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue