Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central -...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - 11 v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

High Court 17 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - 11 v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals
Date of order
17 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - 11 v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3547 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income TaxCentral - 11Vs.Glenmark Pharmaceuticals .. Appellant. .. Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR, K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 17TH AUGUST, 2011. P.C. 1Whether ITAT was justified in holding that the Assessee was eligible for 80IA deduction in respect of the Goa Unit, is the question raised in this Appeal. 2The Assessee Officer held that the Goa Unit is not eligible for 80IA deduction in view of the fact that the said Unit had shown higher gross profit rate as compared to the other non-eligible Units. 3The CIT (A) as also the ITAT have recorded finding of fact that the explanation given by the Assessee for the difference in the gross profit ratio is acceptable and that the Assessing Officer has not pointed any discrepancy in the allocation of expenses. In our opinion, the decision of the ITAT is finding of fact, no question of law arises. The Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan