Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-I, Chennai-34 v. Shri Kishorekumar Gokuldas, Chennai-4

High Court 23 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-I, Chennai-34 v. Shri Kishorekumar Gokuldas, Chennai-4
Date of order
23 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
2009-10, 2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-I, Chennai-34 v. Shri Kishorekumar Gokuldas, Chennai-4, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY Tax Case Appeal No.455 of 2014 and MP.No.1 of 2014 The Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central Circle-I, Chennai-34 ...AppellantVs Shri Kishorekumar Gokuldas,Chennai-4. ...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 11.6.2013 made in I.T.A.No.717/Mds/2013on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B'Bench for the assessment year 2009-10 against the Order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-I Chennai-34 dated 09/1/2013 and made inITA.NO.54/2011-2012 and against the Order of the Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central Circle-I(5) Chennai-34, dated 30/12/2010 and madein PAN.NO. for the Assessment Year 2009-2010. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.SenthilkumarFor Respondent : Mr.Philip George JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J The tax effect of this appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Thecase also does not fall under any of the exceptions laid down inparagraph 8 of the circular. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The question of law isleft unanswered. No costs. Consequently, the above MP is alsodismissed. -s/d-Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar rsTo 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-I, Chennai-343.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle I(5) Chennai-34TCA.No.455 of 2014and MP.No.1 of 2014aa06/04/2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan