The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle I, Tuticorin v. M/S.rose Matches Private Limited
High Court
09 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle I, Tuticorin v. M/S.rose Matches Private Limited
Date of order
09 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle I, Tuticorin v. M/S.rose Matches Private Limited, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-02-2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.979 of 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle I,Tuticorin... Appellant.Versus
M/s.Rose Matches Private Limited43, Main Road,Kovilpatti... Respondent.
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal `A' Bench, Chennai, dated5.9.2011, in ITA No.1135/MDS/2011 arising against the order ofthe Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Madurai dated18.03.2011 in ITA No.0141/08-09, against the assessment order ofthe Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, circle I, Tuticorin,dated 31.12.2008 for the Financial year 2002-2003.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.M.Swaminathan
O R D E R
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenuehad submitted that they may be permitted by this court towithdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the CircularNo.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India,dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter isless than Rs.20,00,000/-.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
cshTo
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle I,Tuticorin.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,circle I, Tuticorin.
+1 cc to M/s.M.Swaminathan, Advocate, sr.8395
rsk cokra 25.02.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.