Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-Ii, Chennai-34 v. Mrs.vijayalakshmi Raju

High Court 23 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-Ii, Chennai-34 v. Mrs.vijayalakshmi Raju
Date of order
23 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-Ii, Chennai-34 v. Mrs.vijayalakshmi Raju, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn in the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated10.12.2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 23.3.2016 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIANandThe Honourable Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY Tax Case Appeal No.533 of 2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-II, Chennai-34....AppellantVsMrs.Vijayalakshmi Raju...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961againsttheorderdated2.1.2015madeinI.T.A.No.2057/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench for the assessmentyear 2008-09 against the order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) II, Coimbatore dated 26.5.2014 made inI.T.Appeal No.69/12-13 against the order of AssistantCommssioner of Income Tax, Central Circle II, Coimbatoredated 26.12.2012. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.SenthilkumarFor Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J The tax effect of this appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs.The case also does not fall under any of the exceptionslaid down in paragraph 8 of the circular. 2. Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn in the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated10.12.2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Thequestion of law is left unanswered. No costs. Asst.Registrar (CS VII ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To 1. The RegistrarIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IICoimbatore 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income taxCentral Circle IICoimbatore 1 cc to Mr.T.R. Senthilkumar, Advocate, Sr. 18883TCA.No.533 of 2015KGK (CO)kk 6/4
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan