Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Chennai v. Dr.v.v.varadarajan

High Court 23 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Chennai v. Dr.v.v.varadarajan
Date of order
23 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Chennai v. Dr.v.v.varadarajan, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 23.3.2016 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIANandThe Honourable Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY Tax Case Appeal No.404 of 2010 The Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central-I, Chennai....Appellant/RespondentVs Dr.V.V.Varadarajan...Respondent/Appellant APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 11.9.2009 made in I.T.A.No.866/Mds/2009on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B'Bench for the assessment year 2001-02 and against the order ofthe Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Chennai 34 dated6.4.2009 made in ITA.No.169/07-08 for the Assessment Year 2001-02 and against the Assessment order passed by AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-I(1), Chennai 34dated 24.12.2007 made in PAN/GIR.No. for theAssessment year 2001-02. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.SenthilkumarFor Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J The tax effect of this appeal is Rs.2,91,853/-. The casealso does not fall under any of the exceptions laid down inparagraph 8 of the circular. 2. Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The questions of law areleft unanswered. No costs. -s/d- Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Chennai 34. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-I(1) , Chenai 34. Central Circle-I(1) , Chenai 34. + 1 cc to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, SR.Standing Counsel for Income Tax Dept. SR.18876 Tax Dept. SR.18876 bvr(co)aa5/4TCA.No.404 of 2010
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan