Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Chennai v. Harvey Heart Hospitals Ltd., Chennai-18

High Court 23 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Chennai v. Harvey Heart Hospitals Ltd., Chennai-18
Date of order
23 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Chennai v. Harvey Heart Hospitals Ltd., Chennai-18, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 23.3.2016 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY Tax Case Appeal No.839 of 2010 The Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central-I, Chennai....Appellant/RespondentVsHarvey Heart Hospitals Ltd.,Chennai-18....Respondent/AppellantAPPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 26.2.2010 made in I.T.A.No.1841/Mds/2008on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A'Bench, Chennai against the orderof the Commissioner of IncomeTax(Appeals)-I, Chennai, dated 30.06.2008 and made inI.T.A.No.417/2007-08 against the order of the AssistantCommissioner of Income tax Central Circle I(2), Chennai dated31.12.2007 and made in PAN.NO. for the Assessment year2004-05.For Appellant : Mr.T.R.SenthilkumarFor Respondent : Mr.V.S.Jayakumar JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J The tax effect of this appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Thecase also does not fall under any of the exceptions laid down inparagraph 8 of the circular. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The questions of law areleft unanswered. No costs. -s/d-Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Assistant RegistrarThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras A benchChennai2.The Commissioner of Income tax,Central-I, Chennai3.The Commissioner of Income tax Appeals-I46 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam Chennai-344.The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle I(2) Chennai-345. The Section Officer, VR Section High Court Madras+1 cc to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Advocate sr.18881TCA.No.839 of 2010aa21/04/2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan