The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central I, Mumbai v. Ipca Laboratories Limited
High Court
21 Dec 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central I, Mumbai v. Ipca Laboratories Limited
Date of order
21 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central I, Mumbai v. Ipca Laboratories Limited, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Issue: 1.The re-framed question of law as framed by the Revenue in this Appeal, reads thus : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in allowing the claim of the assessee u/s.80IB of the I.T.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4171 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, Mumbai..Appellant.Versus
IPCA Laboratories Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant.Mr.F.V. Irani with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 21[st] December, 2010.
1.The re-framed question of law as framed by the Revenue in this Appeal, reads thus :
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in allowing the claim of the assessee u/s.80IB of the I.T. Act which was inclusive of the export incentive / DEPB and duty draw-back received by the assessee by following the decision of the Hon’ble High Court in Elteck’s SGS Private Limited in assessee’s own case of A.Y. 1998-99 ?”
2.
Heard. Admit.
covered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee by the decision of
the Apex Court in the case of Liberty India V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 317 ITR 218. Accordingly, the question is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
4.The Appeal is accordingly disposed off with no order as to costs.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.